Skip to content
A lattice of build, test and review cells

The place your agents are built, tested and kept accountable

One place where the agent's tools, its limits, the point a person approves, and what gets logged are all written down, before it touches real work.

Tools it may touch

Each agent gets an explicit list of systems and actions. Anything outside that list is denied by design.

Where a person approves

The review point is a setting your owner controls and can change.

What gets logged

Inputs, the decision, the reviewer, the outcome: per run, readable without us.

Built for teams that keep improving

Guardrails

An explicit allow-list of systems and actions; everything else is refused.

Review queue

Consequential actions wait for a named approver before anything happens.

Test runs

Run a change against saved cases before it reaches live work.

Versions

Every guideline change is a version with a diff and a reviewer.

Run logs

Inputs, decisions and outcomes per run, readable by your own team.

Rollback

Return to a known-good version in one step, without a project.

Access control

Who may approve, change or read is set by you, per role.

Audit export

Take the whole trail out as a file whenever an auditor asks.

Connected nodes representing a team working together

Built with your team

Your people sit in on the build. They learn to read a run, adjust a guideline, and reject a bad version.

How rollout works
Stacked planes representing documented handover

Built by us, handed over

We build the whole thing, document it, and hand over the ability to change it, with a retainer if you want one.

How an engagement runs

Knowledge and reliability

Knowledge

Your documents become the guidelines

Procedures, price rules and past decisions are turned into instructions the agent cites when it acts, and refuses when it cannot cite.

A field of document blocks
Reliability

Tested against your real exceptions

Before go-live, the agent runs against the messy cases your team collected: the short-ship, the refused document, the call in the wrong language.

Overlapping traces of repeated test runs

Questions owners ask

Can the agent act without anyone checking?

Only on the actions your owner has explicitly allowed. Everything consequential waits in the review queue with a named approver.

Who can change an agent's guidelines?

The people you name. Every change is a version with a diff, a reviewer and a rollback, the same discipline as code.

Do we need engineers to use it?

No. Reading a run, approving an action and adjusting a guideline are designed for the operations owner. Building a new agent is our job or your engineers'. Your choice.

Last reviewed:

A dense lattice of test cells

Bring us the messiest exceptions you have.

That is what we test against first.

Talk to us